{"id":321,"date":"2012-05-01T20:00:02","date_gmt":"2012-05-01T18:00:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.book.artbeeweb.nl\/?p=321"},"modified":"2012-05-03T12:44:32","modified_gmt":"2012-05-03T10:44:32","slug":"corrections-3-exposure","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.book.artbeeweb.nl\/?p=321","title":{"rendered":"Corrections (3 Exposure)"},"content":{"rendered":"<h1>Exposure correction<\/h1>\n<p>Imagine, you take a picture of something and the &#8220;film&#8221; (an electronic one in the backplane of your camera nowadays) gets exposed for 1\/100 of a second. Some parts of the film remain dark, others become bright already.<br \/>\nNow, let&#8217;s double the exposure time to 2\/100.<br \/>\nDuring the first 1\/100, in a very dark spot, the film was exposed for say 5%, and was still unexposed for the remaining 95%. That remaining 95% will again be exposed for another 5% in the second 1\/100 and it&#8217;s quite safe to say that this will result in a 5% existing + 5% added = 10% exposed spot in the film. Hence, in the very dark areas the brightness of the image will be proportional to the exposure.<br \/>\nFor a \u2013 say 90% exposed \u2013 bright spot after the first 1\/100, things are different. In the second 1\/100 only the remaining 10% will be exposed 90% again, but that will add only 10% x 90% = 9% to the already present 90%, to make 99% after doubling the exposure time.<\/p>\n<p>So by increasing the exposure, the darks are \u2013 relatively \u2013 far more affected than the brights.<\/p>\n<h2>In Poser and Vue<\/h2>\n<p>Both programs have the ability to apply <strong>Exposure Correction<\/strong> in post. This is to be preferred over a similar action in Photoshop, because in the programs themselves the correction is applied against the internally stored 48-bit (16 red, 16 green, 16 blue) render result, when all details all still available, before exporting it. Especially exporting to a regular 8-bit color image format will lose detail in either the darks (shadows) or the brights (clouds). Exporting to HDR, EXR of 16-bit TIF might save the day. Note that Photoshop opens the Poser EXR images as 32-bit per color files.<\/p>\n<p>ngg_shortcode_0_placeholderIn Poser, there is no alternative (except from buying Poser Pro).\u00a0Check the Render Settings:<\/p>\n<p>My advice is to take a medium value between 2 and 3, because<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>A value over 2 brings up enough details in the darks<\/li>\n<li>A value below 3 prevents losing all details in the brights<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Then, after export \u2013 in post, you can adjust the difference between your export and the final gamma\/exposure correction.<\/p>\n<p>ngg_shortcode_1_placeholderIn Vue, you can adjust the Advanced Camera Settings (double-click the camera object). Vue offers Gamma Correction as an alternative.<\/p>\n<h2>Exposure value<\/h2>\n<p>There are different ways to express Exposure, which leads to different interpretations of values like 2, 4, 0.5, -3 and so on.<\/p>\n<p>One way expresses Exposure as the lengthening (or shortening) of exposure time. The value 2 means: twice as long, two times as much light into the camera. The opposite of 2 is: one half (0.5). The neutral \u2013 do-nothing \u2013 value is: 1. This is the way exposure is used in Poser.<\/p>\n<p>Another way to express Exposure is in extra diaphragm stops. One extra stop (value: 1) doubles the lens opening, and so the light into the camera. The opposite is: one stop back (or value: -1). The neutral value is: 0, no extra stops. This is the way exposure is used in Vue.<\/p>\n<p>Hence:<\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Poser:<\/td>\n<td>1\/16<\/td>\n<td>1\/8<\/td>\n<td>1\/4<\/td>\n<td>1\/2<\/td>\n<td>1<\/td>\n<td>2<\/td>\n<td>4<\/td>\n<td>8<\/td>\n<td>16<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Vue:<\/td>\n<td>-4<\/td>\n<td>-3<\/td>\n<td>-2<\/td>\n<td>-1<\/td>\n<td>0<\/td>\n<td>1<\/td>\n<td>2<\/td>\n<td>3<\/td>\n<td>4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h2>Engineering stuff<\/h2>\n<p>Some people like the unambiguity of formulas and graphs over texts and words. So:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">After correction = 1 \u2013 (1- Before) <sup><span style=\"font-size: large;\">Exposure<br \/>\n<\/span><\/sup><\/p>\n<p>in which the Poser (exposure time) use of Exposure is used, as I will do in this entire article.<\/p>\n<p>Having exposure A followed by exposure B:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">After correction = 1 \u2013 (1- Before) <sup><span style=\"font-size: large;\">A*B<br \/>\n<\/span><\/sup><\/p>\n<p>which says that exposing something twice as long, followed by exposing three times as long gives the effect of exposing six times as long. No real magic here.<\/p>\n<p>And since exposure = 1 yields the neutral, do-nothing effect,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">After correction = 1 \u2013 (1- Before) <sup><span style=\"font-size: large;\">1\/Exposure<\/span><\/sup><\/p>\n<p>is the inverse. It says that exposing something twice as long is the opposite of exposing half as long.<\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Plotting the exposure curve as such:ngg_shortcode_2_placeholder<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">\nBut when plotting the ratio of after\/before:ngg_shortcode_3_placeholder<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>In which we see that tripling (green line) the exposure time will brighten up the dark areas threefold (0.1 =&gt; 0.3 in the left graph) while having hardly any effect on the already bright spots in the image.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Exposure correction Imagine, you take a picture of something and the &#8220;film&#8221; (an electronic one in the backplane of your camera nowadays) gets exposed for 1\/100 of a second. Some parts of the film remain dark, others become bright already. Now, let&#8217;s double the exposure time to 2\/100. During the first 1\/100, in a very &hellip; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.book.artbeeweb.nl\/?p=321\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Corrections (3 Exposure)&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,7],"tags":[133,134],"series":[17],"class_list":["post-321","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-poser","category-vue","tag-poser","tag-vue","series-corrections"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.book.artbeeweb.nl\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/321","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.book.artbeeweb.nl\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.book.artbeeweb.nl\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.book.artbeeweb.nl\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.book.artbeeweb.nl\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=321"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"http:\/\/www.book.artbeeweb.nl\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/321\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":348,"href":"http:\/\/www.book.artbeeweb.nl\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/321\/revisions\/348"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.book.artbeeweb.nl\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=321"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.book.artbeeweb.nl\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=321"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.book.artbeeweb.nl\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=321"},{"taxonomy":"series","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.book.artbeeweb.nl\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fseries&post=321"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}