This section hosts the following articles:
This section hosts the following articles:
This section hosts the following articles:
This article contains numerous corrections and additions to existing posts. Those are mentioned here, in a separate place, simply because they are not included (yet) in the PDF downloads and because I like to keep my main posts and the PDF in sync.
The manual states that the Library Window, in a 64-bit Poser Pro, cannot be docked. This is indeed the case with Poser Pro 2010, where the General preferences, Library tab, Lauch behavior is greyed out.
However, in Poser Pro the “embedded’ option can be checked when one has the 64-bit version of Flash installed as well. This might be still in beta, but nevertheless.
(thanks to Wim van de Bospoort)
I have stated incorrectly that when you’re in say Characters, you only can see Characters (cr2/crz) items in the Library. Not correct, you can see and use all types of items. This means that you can put dress, accessoires, materials, poses and the like all in one folder, and subfolders. This prevents the scattering around of all sorts of files which you wan to stick together.
(retest as suggested by GeneralNutt and BagginsBill).
For me, P3dO is the content manager of choice.
People using Poser, or Poser Pro in a 32-bit environment, cannot profit from rendering in Queue. Especially for them, but probably for other users (and other uses) as well, the Scripts menu, in Partners, Dimension3D offers the Render Scenes and Render Content (in a standard scene) scripts.
Plus the Render Firefly script with all options in one pane, and the possiblity to go beyond the Poser max settings. So one can set max Raytrace Bounce to 100, if needed.
In the preliminary versin of the tutorial, I have not discussed working with the Ambient pass. In those cases where the Ambient of materials is used to present glowing elements of clothes or buildings or alike, those layers can be used to create an additional glow to the image.
However, when Ambient is used to correct for lighting issues in the scenes, or for emulating surface scattering as might be done with human skin, the Ambient layer is hardly worthwhile to process separately. Your image, your call.
Don’t do things in 3D when they can be done in 2D.
Render passes save a zillion trial and error test-renders, and make results interactively adjustable.
Download this tutorial in PDF format (1.4 Mb).
While working in Poser, I can build a scene, and start tweaking the lights, shadows, atmospheres, specular and reflection strength, and more. And I might like to add special effects, like depth of field (focal blur), volumetric lights, etcetera.
Especially with multiple objects, multiple lights, the use of raytracing and IDL (Indirect Lighting) and alike I have to face renders, re-renders, re-re-renders and all of them having serious waiting times even on my – pretty fast – machine.
Professionals facing a deadline, with a limit on the hours they can spend on the job, or with a customer that shows a lot of variance in his requirements, this is not very desirable. But even hobbyists might face deadlines (the image must be done before Christmas or another event), might find themselves quite flexible in the result they want to achieve, and certainly don’t have the time to spend all forthcoming hours on perfecting that single image.
This is why Render Passes are invented. Each Pass (image) addresses a specific facet of the result, then all passes are combined as layers in a single Photoshop (or GIMP or else) image handling kit, and then the layer parameters are manipulated instead of re-rendering the scene over and over again. In practice, this is not only much faster, it’s also far more interactive.
In this article, making and re-combining render passes is presented, as far as Poser and Photoshop are concerned. Vue will be added in a later stage, or in a separate article. I presume almost all Photoshop steps can be performed in other, similar image handling kit as well. Just the screens might look different.
Step 1 will deal with separating the darks: handling shadows. Step 2 will deal with separating the lights. Both steps can be made in just Poser, and can be combined in: separating darks as well as lights.
Step 3 will deal with the tools available in Poser Pro, and step 4 deals with the Advanced Renderer toolkit.
In this first elementary step I’ll present some basics: just dealing with the shadows in the image. To do so, I need one render result without shadows, and one with shadows only. This can be done in the Render Settings, the Manual department.
First: I uncheck the Cast Shadows option, render, and export the result.
Second: I check both the Cast Shadows as well as the Shadows Only options, render and export the result.
|Without shadows||Shadows only|
Now I’ve got to combine those two in Photoshop. Actually the color pass is the base layer, but since I exported it with a transparent background (PNG, or in Poser Pro: EXR) I’ll added an extra white layer underneath. On top of that I add the shadow layer, and I set the Blend mode to Multiply (“Vermenigvuldigen”, in my Dutch version). Right now, I can adjust the shadow strength by reducing the opacity of this layer to 70%.
This gives me the same result as reducing the shadow-intensity of the light in Poser, but without the re-render.
In reality, all considerations that reduce the depth (darkness) of the shadows will also lead to blurred edges. Deep shadows have hard edges, while shallower shadowing comes with blurred edges. However, it’s a bad idea to use Photoshop blur un the Shadow-layer, because this 2D approach does not take the geometry of the scene into account.
So I re-render the scene, for the shadow-pass only, with a very blurred shadow setting. Note that just tenfolding the blur radius (from default 2 to 20) might give very blodgy shadows, so I tenfold the Samples (from default 19 to 200) as well. Render and export as a new “soft shadows” image.
In the meantime, I’ve created a layer group for the shadow layers, put the already present Shadows only layer into it, and assigned the Multiply blending mode and the 70% opacity to the group while resetting the layer itself to Normal blending, and 100% opacity.
Now I can add the new Soft Shadows layer to the file (and to the shadows-group), Normal blending, 100% opacity too. Then I can start experimenting with the opacity of the top shadow layer. It’s a matter of taste whether to use the hard or the soft shadows layer on top. I prefer the hard ones, as using low opacity values for that layer gives me better control and nuances over the final result.
|0% hard shadows||50% hard shadows||100% hard shadows|
As a result, I’ve got one slider (group opacity) to set the shadow intensity and one (top shadow layer opacity) to set the shadow edge blur. Completely interactive, without the need for a re-render. I can stop right here, or I can use this method to establish the best settings for my final render. For instance, I might conclude that I’ll have to set shadow intensity to 70%, and shadow blur halfway (say radius 10, samples 100) for my final Poser render.
Note: if you look at the car closely, you’ll notice that there is some shadowing under the tires as well which is not dealt with. This is the result of the Ambient Occlusion setting of the light, I’ll discuss it in the next chapter.
In a scene with multiple lights, I’ll have to balance those lights for color and intensity. This too can be done the Render-Pass way, to either achieve the desired result or to achieve the preferred settings for the final render.
The first thing I’ve got to do is to set my Render Settings. In the first run, I uncheck Cast Shadowsand Shadows only to get my shadow-less results. I don’t render, but just Save Settings instead.
Then my help is in the menu: Scripts \ Rendercontrol \ Renderpasses:
Now I alter the Render Settings, check Cast Shadows and Shadows only, Save Settings, go for the RenderPasses script, select a new “Shadows” folder (which I’ve created first), and click [OK]. Same files, but:
Okay, now I’ll have to combine the intermediate files to Photoshop layers. Like in the previous chapter, I make a white background layer to handle the transparencies from the PNG files, and I bring in both Light layers. The first one is set to normal blending (with the background) and the second is set to Screen blending. This blending mode acts if you’re projecting a slide on a wall, which is exactly what happens when we’re adding lights. To reduce the intensity of the second light relative to the first, I can reduce the opacity of that light-layer. If I want to intensities just the other way around, I have to swap the Light layers (and their blending modes).
Then I add the shadow layers. Occlusion – or: self shadowing – has its own blending mode and opacity, the other Hard- and Soft shadow layers per light can be grouped. Each group has Multiply blending and its own opacity, and within each group hard and soft shadows can be balanced separately.
Now it becomes so easy to play.
Softer shadows (group opacity to 50%, hard shadows opacity to 15%), a brightness boost using a curves adjustment on the light-layers, and a color balance adjustment to both lights: more green to Light 1 (right/back side), more red to Light 2 (left/front side).
Poser Pro, from version 2010 up, presents some additional features for generating render passes, and high quality results.
In Render Settings, the right bottom corner, you”ll find the Auxiliary Render Data. Just check a few, render, and export the image (as, say, Multipass.png).
In this example I’ve checked six options, and hence I get seven files:
For the High Definition results (16 or 32 bit per color) file formats HDR and EXR things work exactly the same, you’ll get all files in one export. Please remind to check the “HDRI optimized output” box before rendering when you want to go the HDR route. EXR is Poser internal format, use it when you can afford it.
Let me show you what can be done now.
Assuming that nothing else is arranged for (*), this image or layer stands for: Shadow. So the blending mode should be set to Multiply. And as a bonus we can forget about that previous Separating the darks chapter, because this is catered for already.
To make the maximum use of this, I push the specularity in materials and lights to their limits while keeping the proportions between the various materials. Then I can reduce the shine in the scene by controlling the opacity of this Specularity / Custom 2 layer.
Again, assuming that nothing else is arranged for (*), this image or layer stands for: Diffuse. This is the other – and effectively most relevant – portion of the lit scene. This layer should be in Screen mode too.
ToonID or ObjectID
Each material gets its own ID (or you can assign the same ID to more materials, but why should you do that?), and in this layer each area with the same ID is represented by its own unique color. So, especially when I set the range of the Photoshop colorpicker to 1×1 (point) resolution, I can make selections in the image by just picking a color. This way, I can build masks ans working selections very efficiently. Hence, this layer is a helper, not part of any result as such.
The greyscale in this image or layer represents the distance from the camera into the scene. Nearby is bright, far away is dark. This helps me to place some fog in the scene.
Or, use a dark teal color instead of the clouds, and you’re in a deep sea environment. Take your pick, instant atmospherics.
Another popular thing to do with Z-Depth is creating a Depth of Field effect, or: focal blur. I start with a single layer copy of everything else in the image, Crl+Alt+Shift E does the job in Photoshop merging all (visible) layers into a new one. I put it on top, and give it a serious amount of blur. Then I give it an empty Mask, and copy-paste and invert the Z-Depth into it exactly like I did when making fog. Or otherwise: Ctrl+click the mask of the Fog layer, this will turn that mask into a selection, and then assign a mask to the Blurred layer, which turns my selection into a mask again. Whatever suits you best.
Now the blur is strong at the back (mask is white), intermediate in the middle where I want the sharp focus (mask is grey) and absent at the front (mask is black). But I need it black in the middle (no blur) and white upfront as well, that creates the focal blur effect.
So I Alt-click the mask, and start applying the Curves adjustment. By clicking the drivers chair a dot on the curve tells me how grey it is (105 out of 255 in this example below), and then I raise the extremes and lower that 105 midpoint. That’s it.
This a bit like Z-Depth, but now I can find the X,Y,Z positions in the respective R,G,B channels of this Photoshop layer. You can dream up your own applications for this, one I use often is: use the green (Y, height) channel for making height depending ground fog.
I gave the P(osition) layer a black-to-white gradient background (layer 1) because I had to get rid of the transparency, created a new combi layer (Alt+Ctrl+Shift E) – layer 3, switched to channels, selected and copied to Green channel to the clipboard, pasted this into the mask of the cloudy Ground Fog layer, and inverted it as ground fog is dense (white) at the ground. With an extra blue background, this is a first result.
So I create two layers, each containing the masks, set the bottom one to Normal blending and the top one to Multiply, I combine the layers (Ctrl E), and select – copy – past the result into the cloud mask.
See the result; a brownish cloud hue puts the car in a nice sand storm.
Do note that I just demonstrated the use of the height and depth information over a simple background. Instead of this background, the Diffuse, Specularity and Shadow layers should be combined in proper proportions. Then the fog layer should be on top of them, in Normal mode.
So, with this method I don’t need the first Separate the Darks – method. But I still can use the second Separate the Lights approach. Since this method produces seven files per render (as I ticked six layers plus the total render), and makes a render for each light (I’ve got to in this case) plus the two options (Ambient and Occlusion) checked, I end up with (6+1) * (2+2) = 28 intermediate PNG results.
A lot of those are duplicates, or of no use, and can be discarded. The ones I need are:
And when I want a hard-shadow and a soft-shadow version, I’ve to alter the settings per light, and rerun without the need for an extra Ambient or Occlusion. And I make sure to rename the first Custom 3/ Shadow layers first, otherwise I won’t get anything new. From then on, I can put all the required layers in one Photoshop file and start coloring and dimming the diffuse, specular and shadows on a per-light basis, and so on.
Yes it does exist. The script that gives me instant access to all relevant Firefly parameters AND the ability to make render passes with even more options than before AND on a per-light basis AND with time-stamped filenames so I cannot overwrite previous files accidentally AND in full combination with all file types AND without the superfluous, redundant output files.
So now I can make EXR files for Diffuse, Specular and Shadow. But even for Z-Depth and Altitude.
A few notes:
Advanced Render Settings 2 (*) is one of those great tools created by Basil Gass (Semidieu), and can be purchased for less than $20 ator go directly to .
(*) ARS (see) is for Poser 7 / Poser Pro, while ARS 2 is for Poser 8 / Poser 2010 and up, even supporting the new SubSurfaceScattering options in Poser 9 / Poser Pro 2012.
And it comes with some extra tools (which nowadays can be found in Poser 9 and PoserPro, at least partially, but not everyone has those already). And a good manual that finally tells you where all those render options are for, plus some good tutorials on how to use the tools in combination with Photoshop.
Very recommended, when you want to deploy render passes to the fullest, especially in combination with high resolution imaging, or with (non-Pro) Poser versions which don’t have the PSD-layering build in.
Up till now I’ve discussed relatively straightforward scenes, with direct lights, and results concerning Diffuse, Specular, direct Shadow and indirect Shadow or: Occlusion, and Ambient for some lighting elements. Various tools and procedures might present similar results, differing mostly in the amount of effort to get the details out.
Full-fledged Poser scenes however might be more complicated. Indirect lighting (IDL), objects – like SkyDomes – explicitly used as lighting elements, texture maps assigned to reflection, and more, all can support or hamper the way each tool produces the required results effectively or not at all. This is where we get differences at the content level, in the produces passes themselves.
That is what the next chapters will be about.
This Render Passes article is not about the details of the Poser Materials, but it is worthwhile contemplating them a bit. As you have noticed in previous chapters, aspects like Diffuse, Specular and Shadow can be diverted to separate layers or images. This gives me the possibility to handle color, highlights and darks in details, even on a per-light basis.
But Poser supports other aspects, like Ambient and Reflection, and also supports Indirect Lighting (IDL). How do these relate to the split (in Poser) and glue (in Photoshop) approach? And what are then the best ways to get the required results out efficiently?
My suggestion on doing Render Passes, which applies to all cases that PoserPro is used, is to switch off Gamma Correction. Because:
When using just Firefly I can make a shadows-only and a shadow-less result as described in chapter 2 Separating the Darks. Unless I’ve got Poser Pro 2010+, I can select sub-passes in the Auxiliary Render Data list in Render Settings, as described in chapter 4 Featuring Poser Pro.
The other sub-passes behave as described earlier. So, I just make a run with Cast Shadows checked without Custom 1 elected, and another run with Cast Shadows unchecked, with only Custom 1 selected. And I do have to save to an 8-bit per color format (PNG) as those sub-passes don’t apply to the high definition (HDR/EXR) formats.
As described in chapter 3 Separating the Lights, this script generates separate passes per direct light in the scene. And then, when Poser Pro is used, is also saves these light-passes with the sub-passes described above. Then the case of using IDL and SkyDomes becomes interesting: at each light-pass, the SkyDome lighting is present too, but somewhat reduced compared to the final, total render. I don’t know how they do it, but when the Light-passes are combined in Photoshop using Screen blending mode, the IDL lighting appears properly. I imagined there could be a problem, having IDL present in each Light layer, but there isn’t.
The script also offers Occlusion and Ambient. Both come as rendered with all lights off. Without IDL, the Ambient pass presents a combination of Diffuse and Ambient but I don’t know what to do with it, while the Occlusion – Custom 1 pass offers the Ambient alone and the Custom 3 pass offers the neat self-shadowing. With IDL however, the Ambient pass presents a neat ambient while Occlusion still presents the self-shadowing, but goes wild in the Custom 1 sub-pass. That is: since all direct lights are off, a SkyDome with its color in Diffuse will not contribute either and leaves the Ambient channel of the ball, plus some color bleeding. But when the color of the Dome is in Ambient, the Occlusion- Custom 1 subpass presents us some IDL-only like version of the scene.
Are you still with me? Or are you feeling a bit like: let’s shut on and off IDL, let’s shut on and off shadow catching, let’s switch on all auxiliary sub passes, let’s render, and then let’s pick everything that might contribute to the result. Can’t blame you, sometimes that my approach too.
So, where are we?
Do I need an additional tool, as most of the passes can be made without it? I think I do, since it not only can do more and better but also saves me most of the hassle.
In the first place I can get Z-depth and Altitude (the Y-part of Position) and Alpha MAT (the equivalent of Toon/Object ID) without the sub-passes, and hence without the need for PoserPro or with PoserPro, it works for the high definition output as well.
Second, I can get Shadows, and everything else shadow-less, in one go: I just check the Shadows option and I uncheck the Cast Shadows for rendering, as the shadow pass is generated even when they’re off in the rendered result (tip: save the settings before rendering). I can ask for separate light-passes as well (even separate figure passes). I must render without IDL though, hence I can get it without the need for PoserPro or with PoserPro, it works for the high definition output as well. Note that I can get separate shadows in an IDL render as well, but that requires the Custom 3 subpass, and why should I follow the hard way?
Third, I can separate Reflection and Specular, provided that I render without IDL and that I use the Custom 2 pass. So that requires PoserPro and 8-bit per color. The reflection then can be found in the Color \ Custom 2 pass.
Specular comes on a per-light basis, when requested so by ticking that option. Note that if I don’t crank out the reflection as described, I can still get the Specular + Reflection combination in the Custom 2 sub-passes of each light. I can’t get Reflection out separately when using just Poser, or when exporting to EXR.
Forth, I can get Diffuse and Ambient out separately, I just tick the boxes. Diffuse can come per light, as requested. In the meantime, the (per light) Custom 1 sub-passes give me Diffuse + Ambient + Refraction, and those sub-passes require PoserPro and 8-bit per color (PNG) output. I’ve found no way yet to get out the Refraction separately. But at least I can alter the effect by adding or subtracting Ambient and/or Diffuse from this layer, which is nice anyway.
Reducing effects was simple, I just had to turn the opacity slider down for a shadow or light, or ambient or reflection or else. But how about enforcing an effect? More light, stronger shadow, more reflection?
Well, each layer or group in screen mode acts like an additional projector beaming an additional image onto the result, and each shadow layer in multiply mode does something similar for the lack of light. So, I only have to add copies of the layers to add an extra light or shadow, or a stronger reflection of something else.
And for creating say 1.5 times the effect? Well, I just add a duplicate layer and set its opacity to 50%, so I’ve got 1.5 layers for that effect. Now, let’s reconsider re-combining the passes to one Photoshop result.
It was stated earlier, that adding a shadow to a shadow-less layer required a Multiply blending mode for the overlaying shadow layer. But what to do when there are more of those layers, say on a per-light basis?
Now, I’d like to reduce the intensity and alter the color of that light. This should not be done at the group level, as that will alter the shadow as well. And dimmed reddened lights still produce non-dimmed black shadows. But as long as the group really addresses one single light, and don’t include additional IDL from other sources, all the other passes for that light must change. So either I can alter them in sync (tedious), or I can put them in an additional “illumination” subgroup. See the image.
When I want to alter the color and intensity of the light, I can put a filter in front of it. This will make a new layer, on top in the Illumination group. Like I did with a Red, 50% brightness layer. And since it takes light out, it’s set to Multiply blending. Note that reducing the Opacity of this layer just reduces the filtering: the light gets less red and less dark. I also can put in a Red, 100% layer, and reduce the Opacity of the Illumination group. Take your pick.
Some engineering stuff
Let’s look at the Photoshop layering presented in the chapter on Light: the examples put all shadowing at the top and all lighting under them. For total light L, total shadow S, light and shadow L1, S1, L2 and S2 from lights 1 and 2, the math goes:
L * S = S1 * S2 * L thanks to the Multiplying of shadows,
and (1-L) = (1-L1) * (1-L2) or: L = L1 + L2 – L1 * L2 for the Screening.
This combines to : result L * S = S1 * S2 * L1 + S1 * S2 * L2 – S1 * S2 * L1 * L2
Now, let’s look at the layering just presented above.
( 1 – L * S ) = (1 – L1 * S1) * (1 – L2 * S2) so result L * S = S1 * L1 +S2 * L2 – S1 * S2 * L1 * L2
So in the first approach, the contribution S1L1 from light 1 is additionally reduced by S2, and vice versa for the other light. In other words: there is too much shadow in the first approach.
one light is not softening the shadow of the other light.
one light is softening the shadow of the other light.
Some render passes or sub-passes give a combined result, like Diffuse + Ambient + Shadows, and a separate Ambient pass, but no separate Diffuse pass. Hence the question: can I create one? Not for the sake of it, but for enhancing that particular aspect of the image.
Well, since shadows are added to the result by multiplication, and since Photoshop supports a Divide blending mode, taking shadows out is a no-brainer. Add the shadow layer (B) on top of the compound layer (A), set the shadow layer to Divide blending, and done (D). Unless you’re experiencing edge-effects (C). This indicates that the shadow layer does not line up exactly, and you might move it a pixel vertically and/or horizontally. BTW: this happens all the time to me, I don’t know if its Photoshop or the render pass creation itself but in general, passes move one pixel (to the left and down) when putting them together. Moving them back gives me the desired result.
This intermediate shadow-less result still is the combination of Diffuse and Ambient. Since this combination is made in Poser, it’s the result of a plain addition. And since Photoshop supports a Subtraction blending, this is what I have to do to get the Ambient (E) out to get the required Diffuse-only (F). Again, watch the edges and if necessary, move the layer a bit.
So Multiply and Screen are the ways to combine passes into a result, while Divide and Subtract are the ways to break combined passes into singular ones. Note that Photoshop supports Subtract-blending and Difference-blending. You need the first, not the second.
With a remark: Subtracts works well on Poser results because Poser itself uses plain addition (instead of screening) to make its results. When other applications (Vue perhaps) use screening instead, one has to find a way to un-screen. Photoshop does not support this un-screen blending mode directly. The trick: if you want to un-screen Ambient out of a Diffuse & Ambient combination, then you’ve got to Subtract and then to Divide by the inverse of the Ambient layer (in Photoshop: Ctrl+I). So you need the Ambient layer twice, first in Subtract blending, then its inverse in Divide blending.
(*) substitute the first 1 by (1-A)/(1-A) (**) just rewrite (***) the inverse of A is: 1-A, black turns white, red turns cyan, blue turns yellow, etc on a per-pixel basis. Ctrl+I does the job.
So when you’ve got a combined Specular & Reflection pass, and a separate Reflection Pass, you can separate out a Specular pass as well. Now you know how to do it: when they come from Poser – just Subtract.
Splitting aspects of a scene by considering properties of materials is an almost infinite process, as materials and render technology becomes more and more complex. What happens, for instance, with the Alt_Diffuse and Alt_Specular channels of a Poser surface? What happens when nodes like Velvet are used that combine diffuse, specular and ambient? Or nodes that combine Refraction and Reflection, like Fresnel? Which kind of split occurs with the shader trees generated by EZSkin, VSS or MatMatic? What is the effect of SubSurfaceScattering, as introduced by Poser 9 / PoserPro 2012? Will Smith Micro or Semidieu or anyone else bring us new tools (say, after reading this tutorial J )?
I don’t have the answers to all this, but I keep on experimenting, finding out, telling you and updating this article. Feel encouraged to do the same, and tell me about it. In the meantime, I’ve found out:
In some cases there are differences, in some cases there are not. Shadows in Poser are obtained by a multiplication mechanism similar to Photoshop. But the effects of lights, and the effects of material aspects like Diffuse and Ambient are – in Poser – combined by plain addition instead of screening.
In Poser this generates over-lighting situations quite easily, as a 60% brightness plus another 60% brightness add up to 120%, which then is clipped to 100%.
In post, screening would give: C = 1 – (1-60%)*(1-60%) = 84%, there is no way to over-light a scene. So there will be no clipping either. But this also implies that bright areas in post will look less bright than in Poser. Poser seems to work as a camera which does not adapt itself to higher lighting levels, in post we seem to work with a camera with an automatically reduced film-sensitivity (or shutter time, of diaphragm opening, whatever you prefer).
So post-worked results will differ from Poser. Equally deep in the shadows but softer in the highlights, and without clipping.
Another difference comes with the use of correction methods. Poser supports Exposure Correction, while Poser Pro supports Gamma Correction as well. Those corrections are mainly required to soften the effects of shadows and highlights as well. Deep shadows can hide the nuances of dark textures on objects, which are visible in real life due to the scattering of light in our environment and due to the adaptive working of our eyes when looking into dark places. See the Understanding Corrections tutorial on the details. Strong highlights will cause over-lighting and clipping, as noted already.
When rendering out passes, we do not need those corrections. We’ve got other ways to soften shadows (just blur the shadow layer and reduce its opacity), and over-lighting is almost preventing automatically. So, please, do switch those corrections OFF when rendering out passes for post-production. When you need a generic correction on the image, you can always put one in as a Curves or Levels adjustment. I bet you hardly don’t.